Rutgers University Student Instructional Rating
(Online Survey)
Tang Yaqin
Spring 2014, 14:440:127:11 — Int Computer For Eng (index #7760)
Enrollment= 41, Responses= 9

Part A: University-wide Questions:
Student Responses Weighted Means
Strong
Disagree
1
Strong
Agree
5
No response
 
Section Course Level Dept
1. The instructor was prepared for class and presented the material in an organized manner 0 0 0 3 6 0 4.67 3.89 3.94 3.87
2. The instructor responded effectively to student comments and questions 0 0 1 4 4 0 4.33 3.96 4.04 3.79
3. The instructor generated interest in the course material 1 0 1 5 2 0 3.78 3.44 3.58 3.49
4. The instructor had a positive attitude toward assisting all students in understanding course material 0 0 0 1 8 0 4.89 4.05 4.15 3.97
5. The instructor assigned grades fairly 0 0 0 1 8 0 4.89 4.19 4.24 3.82
6. The instructional methods encouraged student learning 0 0 1 3 5 0 4.44 3.50 3.63 3.39
7. I learned a great deal in this course 1 0 1 2 5 0 4.11 3.64 3.73 3.56
8. I had a strong prior interest in the subject matter and wanted to take this course 1 0 2 1 5 0 4.00 3.30 3.39 3.35
 PoorExcellent 
9. I rate the teaching effectiveness of the instructor as 0 0 1 3 5 0 4.44 3.54 3.66 3.43
10. I rate the overall quality of the course as 0 0 1 3 4 1 4.38 3.31 3.44 3.33

What do you like best about this course?:

I learned many useful and practical skills and practiced a lot.

nothing

It's like learning a new language, very cool!


If you were teaching this course, what would you do differently?:

nothing

More feasible office hours.


In what ways, if any, has this course or the instructor encouraged your intellectual growth and progress?:

none


Other comments or suggestions::

Way better at speaking english clearly than last semester. I am proud to say that I didn't fall asleep during recitation and I could understand every word.